BCAT was introduced following concerns over the ability and quality of trainees entering BPTC courses. The test is designed as a filter to prevent those who don’t have the key qualities needed to be a practising barrister – critical thinking skills and reasoning – entering the BPTC and impeding another student’s progress.
What Does the BCAT Measure?
BCAT is designed to measure a person’s ability to approach a situation and a) objectively evaluate it based on limited information plus b) see certain issues from a variety of perspectives. In short, it evaluates the basic skills needed to function as a barrister. These skills, known as critical thinking, can be broken down into the ‘RED’ model:
Recognising Assumptions
A flaw of the human condition is our natural tendency to believe the truthfulness of information we are presented with, even when there is little or no evidence to back it up. Being aware of, and critically questioning, assumptions can help to reveal where a ‘fact’ is undermined because of a lack of evidence or flaws in an argument. It is a vital skill for members of the bBr to be able to question assumptions from a variety of viewpoints.
Evaluating Arguments
Accurately scrutinising the strengths and weaknesses of an argument means asking the right questions to uncover the underlying evidence. Individuals tend to either favour information that supports a view they already hold, or they allow their emotions to inhibit their objectivity.
Drawing Conclusions
Drawing appropriate, evidence-based conclusions requires a person to be able to bring together all the facts and information at their disposal. When drawing conclusions, it is important to understand the strengths and weaknesses of the evidence and to avoid generalisation. Perhaps most importantly of all, showing good judgement means being comfortable changing your position when the evidence warrants doing so. BCAT assesses the ability of candidates in these three areas, using a bespoke test based on the Watson Glaser model. This model of critical thinking dates from the 1920s and is still widely used today throughout the private and public sectors. In addition to forming the basis of the BCAT, the Watson Glaser model is also regularly used by law firms as an assessment tool for recruitment.
Why Was the BCAT Introduced?
The BCAT was introduced in 2013 by the Bar Standards Board (BSB), following a report by the Bar Vocational Course Review Group, chaired by Derek Wood QC – widely known as The Wood Report. Research, as well as practical experience, had shown the BSB that students who failed the BPTC tended to do so because they lacked the necessary reasoning and critical thinking skills to function in a high-pressure courtroom environment. Since a large part of the BPTC involves role-playing courtroom and client interactions, The Wood Report concluded that students without these skills not only wouldn’t pass the BPTC, but their lack of progress would impede their more able peers. To tackle the issues of individual failure and group underachievement, the report recommended the adoption of a test to assess the likelihood that an applicant will pass the BPTC, with a pass being the condition of entry onto the course.
What Role Does the BCAT Play in BPTC Admissions?
Before it was introduced formally in 2013, the BCAT was tested on over 1,600 students studying courses in the UK. The results clearly showed that a higher mark on the BCAT was the best indicator of an individual’s likelihood to achieve a good BPTC result. In particular, the BCAT validity study showed that the test was a stronger predictor of a candidate’s BPTC grade than A-Level results, degree classification or what university the student attended. Once they have taken the BCAT, students receive either a ‘strong pass’, ‘pass’, ‘marginal pass’, or ‘significant fail’. Students are expected to answer over half the questions correctly to pass the test. Candidates who receive a ‘pass’ will be eligible to enrol onto a BPTC; those who fail will not. Students who fail, and where there are extenuating circumstances, may resit their BCAT in an attempt to achieve a pass. They can resit up to three times in a calendar year. Only one in four students who pass the BCAT, however, go on to win a pupillage and complete the BPTC. Although passing the BCAT is a prerequisite to obtaining pupillage, it is far from the only thing which firms look at when choosing between BPTC candidates.
Where, When and How Can You Sit the BCAT?
BCAT costs £150 to take if you sit the test in the UK or £170 for students sitting the test overseas. The Bar Standards Board provides a full list of test centres where BCAT is available. There is also a test centre locator on the Pearson Vue website, allowing individuals to find their closest location. It is only possible to take the BCAT within a specified window of dates each year, determined by the BSB. These are usually from January to September. Although the BCAT is available globally, it is not possible to sit the test in any language other than English, and students are required to answer all the questions on a designated computer provided by the test centre. Candidates are given 55 minutes to attempt the BCAT and will receive their results as soon as they have completed the test.
What Questions Appear on the BCAT?
The BCAT does not test a student’s legal knowledge. Instead, questions are posed which aim to test the candidate’s ability to think through problems clearly and logically. The questions on the BCAT are divided into five sections:
2. Recognition of Assumptions
This second section of the BCAT tests a student’s ability to recognise and allow for assumptions as part of the critical thinking process. Students are presented with a statement followed by an assumption, and are asked to work out whether or not the assumption is made in the presented statement.
3. Deductive Reasoning
During this third test section, candidates are presented with a series of stated facts followed by a conclusion which those facts may support. The student’s task is to determine whether the evidence presented supports the stated conclusion.
4. Logical Interpretation
The fourth section also tests the candidate’s ability to make a logical interpretation of the facts as presented. Each question has a paragraph of information followed by a statement and, once again, asks the student to judge whether the statement follows from the text.
5. Evaluation of Arguments
Finally, the BCAT presents a set of questions made up of a statement, followed by several possible arguments that may be made relating to that statement. Candidates are asked to determine whether each argument is strong or weak based on the facts presented.
Sample questions for each of the BCAT sections are available on the BSB website You can take a practice test online via TalentLens The BCAT Handbook, published by the BSB, is a trove of information for those looking to prepare for the test
What Is the Best Way to Prepare for the BCAT?
Since the BCAT is a psychometric test of critical thinking ability, rather than a test of learned facts or knowledge, there is a limited amount of preparation that candidates can undertake. Some step by step BCAT test tips for candidates are:
When reading information, pose yourself questions based on what you have read. Practise using deductive reasoning to separate a fact from an assumption, and constantly question the validity of supposed facts. Think questioningly about the quality of arguments which are put forward to you. Rate assumptions which you uncover in arguments – both your own and those of others – and consider whether they affect the validity of the argument. It is good practice to use your academic studies as a place to develop this skill and to question assumptions where you find them. If you are presented with a written text, take the time to consider who the intended audience is. Often, authors will change the way they write, or be selective with the information and evidence they include, in order to present their argument in the best possible light to a specific audience. Consider tools, such as emotion and persuasion, that the writer may be using and how they may affect any conclusion that you draw. Practise thinking through all possible sides of arguments you are presented with. Newspapers are a good place to find conflicting interpretations of the same facts, which may be equally valid even if they do not reflect your own views. Develop the skill of putting your thoughts down in hard copy. You may find that writing notes, drawing pictures, developing diagrams of flowcharts or another format altogether best suits your thinking style. Putting your thoughts down on paper, in whatever format, is an important tool to organise your thinking and spot connections that you may not otherwise have noticed. Summarise the thoughts and questions that you have based on what you have read. Writing these things down will help you keep track of your thinking and organise your next steps logically. Test and evaluate a variety of possible conclusions to see how they stack up in relation to the evidence. Practise considering the strength of conclusions you make by going back to compare them to the facts you started out with, and thinking about how they might affect other realities.
